Evidence
given by a police officer should not be discarded outright as
untrustworthy merely under the presumption that his version may be
coloured or biased, the Supreme Court observed.
“There
is no legal proposition that evidence of police officials unless
supported by independent evidence is unworthy of acceptance. Evidence of
police witnesses cannot be discarded merely on the ground that they
belong to police force and interested in the investigation and their
desire to see the success of the case,” a Bench of Justices J.S. Khehar
and R. Banumathi said in a recent judgment.
On the other hand, the judgment said the evidence given by a police officer should be carefully scrutinised by the trial court.
“Prudence
however requires that the evidence of police officials who are
interested in the outcome of the result of the case needs to be
carefully scrutinised and independently appreciated. Mere fact that they
are police officials does not by itself give rise to any doubt about
their creditworthiness,” the apex court said.
Contraband case
The
Bench passed the observations while awarding 10-year prison sentence to
an accused caught with 13 quintals of contraband and 20 kg of poppy
husk in a vehicle 26 years ago. The court was answering a plea by the
accused, Baldev Singh, that his conviction cannot be based on the
evidence given by a police officer, who was part of the probe team in
the case. He said the officer was apparently an interested party and not
impartial witness who favoured his conviction.
No comments:
Post a Comment